2010年8月29日星期日

只需2年就不必等民联执政 黄和联治水政治伎俩


人联党诗巫支部主席黄顺舸说,行动党的黄和联要求疏浚拉让江,看来只是政治伎俩,而且他若是能够以两年来消除水患,何必要等到民联执政才来做。黄和联指人民不会允许第10大马计划拨3000万令吉疏浚,这也和他先前的言论有所矛盾。过去为了博取人民支持,黄和联不断炮轰政府,要求开挖拉让江河床,如今他见到人联党终于争取到疏浚款项,料是知道没能继续以此作文章,反而又说人民不会允许政府拨款3000万令吉疏浚,前后充满矛盾。另有一个矛盾之处是,黄和联既然已经和海内外专家对拉让江治水做了充份的研究,那为何不晓得拉让江的所有瓶颈位于何处?为何还得向有关当局索取?

黄和联若只需2年时间,即可让诗巫免除水患,不必等到民联执政,因为现在已经给了他机会负起疏浚的责任。黄和联不必再发表“若执政论”,这一次政府愿意给他一个机会证明自己的治水能力。既然黄和联说只需2年,就给他2年,所以他所提呈的治水计划书,必须是以2年时间为限。黄和联的另一项解决诗巫水患之法,是挖水池。黄和联说在武吉阿瑟地区有3个水池,每个1依甲。然而,黄和联是否知道,当大水淹来整个地区都泛滥了,1依甲大的水池又有何用。如果民联无能执政砂州,有谈何来的治水计划,讲爽而以咯。。。

2010年8月8日星期日

国选官司筹得法律基金 "下落不明”


行动党与民联支持者的罗万雄表示﹐尽管行动党向来强调党内问题须党内解决﹐但身为党全国副主席的张健仁为博上报宣传和打击异己﹐经常上报抨击温利山。他说﹐行动党在强调透明度﹑公平与肃贪是众所周知的。对此﹐他促请张健仁以身作则﹐公布他在面对许怀标诉讼案时﹐向公众筹募法律基金的征文录﹐以昭大信。既然张健仁已在这宗案件获胜﹐并已向许怀标追讨百万令吉的律师费﹐那么公众想要知道那笔来自支持者血汗钱的庞大法律基金的下落。他建议把该笔巨款转捐予华文独中﹐以充作办学经费。同时﹐他也对张健仁斩钉截铁说不会与砂州国阵组织联合政府之说词信心不足﹐因为现任砂州行动党某实权领袖就曾经为当官而退出该党的前例﹐所以﹐他促张健仁是否敢发誓这种事不会重蹈覆辙﹖

此外罗万雄对砂州行动党内爆发党争事件感到失望!他表示,温利山事件,其实只是小问题,可是却越演越烈,一向来亲行动党的他对行动党爆发党争感到失望,同时也认为该党砂州委员会应该给予全体人民满意的交代。 “我认为,该党砂州委员会必须公正、透明化处理温利山事件。”他表示,“ 真的假不了,假的真不了 ”,人民的眼睛是雪亮的,他希望,行动党州委会能够尽快恢复人民对行动党的信心。他指出,曾经有心人指说温利山有意加入爱国党的传闻,而温利山也告诉他,如果要加入爱国党,何必等到今天,那些是有心人企图破坏他的名誉。他表示,党争谁对谁错并不重要,有心人应该枪口对外,而不是针对自己人,少说话,多做民生课题,以大事为重,团结力量。 毕竟大家同是一条船,为何要分A、B队

行动党砂联会改选后.内部出现亲国阵势力

行动党老党员吴令赐揭露,行动党砂州联委会改选后,内部出现一股亲国阵势力。他指出,为行动党服务了30年的老党员张南顺透露,在砂州委员会改选后,本来是风平浪静的党由一股亲国阵势力在党内兴风作浪,制造不同问题,并导致巴都林当州议员温利山被冻结党籍6个月倘若民联在来届选举无法保持27州的成绩,反对党领袖应该引咎辞职,以谢选民。他支持这种说法,并希望张南顺努力收集亲国阵的资料,交给行动党纪律委员会,把这股亲国阵势力揪出来,以正视听。他建议,不论高低职位的党员,如有犯错应通过内部解决,例如支部常月会议、支部常年大会、砂联委会会议及全国党员代表大会,都可以解决内部矛盾。 “党员若有犯错,应该经过访问及深入了解,相互沟通后再决定应如何解决问题,给犯错的一方有解释的机会。”

<<自己人打自己人,还怪罪于国阵,可见行动党元老都对现今行动党的领袖没信心>>


他认为,党员也不应该逞一时之快,将内部的事务公诸于报端。这只会让亲者痛、仇者快。他也不讳言,砂州国阵主席兼砂首席部长丕显斯里泰益玛目是最适合领导国阵的领导人。他说,行动党砂联委会自1978年于砂成立30年,面对泰益玛目领导的国阵。除了曾在1981年于古晋国会议席由沈光仰胜出、诗巫国会选区由林仕铭胜出及民都鲁国州议席由周政新胜出外,行动党整30年都面对泰益所领导的砂国阵所打压。他指出,即便是如今,行动党也只能在华人选区报捷,在土著选区没有一点能耐。砂州政权仍牢控在砂国阵的手中。有鉴于此,他表示,在砂政局走到如今的地步,行动党的前景光明,在民联成员党的团结下随时可以执政砂州。


但是,反对党不思团结、不求同存异、不和谐共处,执政砂州的机会仍很难。他也认同人民公正党砂联委会主席巴鲁比安让原有的州议员在其选区上阵的说法。很公正、很有道理,也是正义之言。 “所以我认为,古晋区的州选区里,哥打圣淘沙州选区由张健仁出战、巴都林当由温利山出战、朋岭区由杨薇讳出战、浮罗岸区由黄锦河出战及石角归公正党。”他希望,人民公正党努力确保石角州选区的胜出。他说,现在反对党拥有27州议席,反对党领袖也应该负起全责维持现有的议席数量,若有闪失则应引咎辞职



DAP’s Voon Says Only Taib Can Lead BN Sarawak

In an exclusive interview with Tribune’s Si Poh Liang, the Democratic Action Party’s Batu Lintang State Assemblyman, Voon Lee Shan, has described Pehin Sri Haji Abdul Taib Mahmud as the only person who can lead the ruling Barisan Nasional’s dominant Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB).“There is still no one capable of replacing Pehin Sri Haji Abdul Taib Mahmud. Who will be able to lead the State Barisan Nasional? Taib is still the only leader capable of leading the PBB (Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu Sarawak)".


On question of DAP and Pakatan Rakyat, have been accused of importing so-called peninsular confrontational politics to our shores and also that proper decorum in the DUN was not observed. Two opposition members have been suspended from DUN. YB Voon commended that "Different people have different styles. I like to achieve things in a different way. I feel that the Dewan (State Legislative Assembly) is a place where we must have very sincere, frank and honest discussions."



"We debate the issues. It is not a place where you simply shout and you shout. There are times you shout and people may agree but you must look at the issues and be very careful.Time is limited. We are given 20 to 30 minutes. You must speak sensibly. You shout and then if you are kicked out, the people’s representation expected of you is gone. I will not do it. Not for cheap publicity. I will not do it. I don’t care what the party’s stand is. I will not simply shout. I have my principles. I want representation for the people of Batu Lintang. I represent the people.



If I shout, I make sure I shout in a correct way. If I talk, I will talk with sense. I will give constructive criticism.That is most important. You criticise them but you must give them ideas on how to overcome problems. That is what the government wants. Rough politics in the Dewan and shouting unnecessarily is something not acceptable. Lawyers are trained to argue professionally.The people’s representative must lead. They must be more knowledgeable. It must be a contest over ideas.

两边对齐

**DAP Voon's himself also agreed that the others DAP's ADUN & PKR ADUN are shouting for nothing.. and the 2 wakil rakyats who was suspended from DUN who were also lawyers but not trained professionally. They just simply shout for nothing.**